See Position Description

RFQ Attorney Representation For Indigent Parents In Dependency and Termination Cases

Office of Public Defense
Statewide, WA
고용형태: Various Job Types

시애틀KR 직업 분석

부양가족 및 해지 사건에 대한 불성실한 부모를 위한 RFQ 변호사 대리인

Key Skills and Qualifications

Technical Skills

RCW 13.34 and court rules pertaining to dependency and termination cases
Washington State Supreme Court Standards for Indigent Defense

Soft Skills

Trauma-informed advocacy
Anti-racist, intersectional, non-judgmental, and truly holistic advocacy
Communication skills with stressed clients
Collaboration and relationship-building with court partners
Energy, enthusiasm, and commitment to indigent defense

Qualifications

Licensed member of good standing with the Washington State Bar
Master's degree or higher (not specified)
Experience in dependency and termination cases
Commitment to parents' rights and social justice issues
Interest in intersectional advocacy

Physical Requirements

No specific physical requirements mentioned in the job description.

Sample Interview Questions and Answers

Question 1: How would you approach representing an indigent parent who is facing termination of their parental rights, particularly in a case where there are allegations of neglect or abuse?

When representing an indigent parent in a termination case, I would first take the time to thoroughly understand the client's situation and circumstances. This includes reviewing the court documents, speaking with the client about their experiences and concerns, and researching relevant case law and legislation. Next, I would identify areas where the state's allegations may be unsupported or disputed, such as through investigation of the child's living environment or examination of potential biases in the reporting process. I would then work closely with my client to develop a defense strategy that is tailored to their unique needs and circumstances. This might involve seeking expert testimony, advocating for alternative solutions to termination, or challenging the state's evidence through cross-examination and other means. Throughout the case, I would prioritize maintaining open and honest communication with my client, keeping them informed about developments and providing support as needed. Ultimately, my goal is to ensure that my client's rights are protected and their voice is heard in court.

Question 2: What strategies would you use to address implicit bias in your representation of indigent parents, particularly those from historically marginalized communities?

As an attorney representing indigent parents, I recognize the importance of addressing implicit bias in my practice. To do this, I would first take the time to educate myself on the systemic and structural barriers that disproportionately affect historically marginalized communities. This might involve attending training sessions or workshops on issues like cultural competence, racial bias, and trauma-informed care. Next, I would work to create a safe and inclusive environment for my clients, acknowledging their experiences and validating their emotions. I would also strive to remain aware of potential biases in the reporting process, court proceedings, and even within my own thought processes. To mitigate these biases, I might seek input from colleagues or experts with diverse backgrounds and perspectives, or engage in reflective practice to identify areas for improvement. Throughout the case, I would prioritize transparency and communication with my client, ensuring that they are aware of any potential biases or concerns and feel empowered to make informed decisions about their representation.

Question 3: How would you handle a situation where there is a conflict between your client's wishes and the needs of the child in dependency proceedings?

In cases where there is a conflict between my client's wishes and the needs of the child, I would first take the time to thoroughly understand both perspectives. This might involve seeking input from social workers, therapists, or other experts who have worked with the family. Next, I would work closely with my client to explore potential alternatives that balance their rights and interests with those of the child. If necessary, this might involve negotiating with opposing counsel or the court to develop a compromise that meets both parties' needs. Throughout the case, I would prioritize maintaining open and honest communication with all parties involved, ensuring that everyone is aware of the client's wishes and concerns. Ultimately, my goal is to ensure that the child's best interests are protected while also advocating for my client's rights.

원본 채용 공고

묘사

워싱턴 주

공안국

사우스 캐피톨 웨이 711, 스위트 106, 

올림피아, 워싱턴 98504-0957

자격 요청

RFQ25031

불우한 부모를 위한 변호사 대리인 

종속성 및 종료 사례


[이 웹사이트에서 제공되는 혜택 정보] 
계약자에게 적용되지 않음]

워싱턴 주 국방부(OPD) 부모 대리 프로그램(PRP)은 현재 모든 워싱턴 카운티에서 아동 의존 및 친권 절차 종료에 관여하는 불우한 부모, 양육자 및 법적 보호자에게 주 자금 지원 변호사 대리 및 사건 지원 서비스를 제공하고 있습니다.  

스노호미시 카운티: 최소 25%(개방형 및 능동형 종속 및 종료 사례 20건)에서 최대 100%(개방형 및 능동형 종속 및 종료 사례 80건)의 파트타임 사례가 포함됩니다. 이 직책은 완료될 때까지 열려 있으며 시작 날짜는 협상 가능합니다.

모든 카운티: OPD는 즉각적인 개장을 예상하지는 않지만, 향후 개장이 가능해질 경우 관심 있는 당사자를 파악하기 위해 모든 카운티에 대한 신청을 기꺼이 수락할 의향이 있습니다. 

정규직 변호사의 대략적인 사건 수는 80건입니다. 현재 정규직 계약자의 연간 보상액은 $200,347입니다. 파트타임 변호사 직책 보상은 정규직 사건 수 비율에 따라 비례하여 지급됩니다. 보상에는 지원 직원, 임대료 및 기타 사업 비용과 같은 모든 오버헤드가 포함됩니다. 보상은 경력에 따라 달라집니다. PFML은 종종 계약자(민간 로펌 포함)의 직원에게 제공됩니다. PFML 프로그램에는 단독 실무 계약자와 같은 자영업자를 위한 옵트인이 포함되어 있습니다. 자세한 내용은 다음 링크에서 확인할 수 있습니다 https://paidleave.wa.gov/elective-coverage/

관심이 있으시면 아래 신청 절차를 따르세요. 

지지하다: OPD는 다음에 따라 계약직 변호사에게 전문가 서비스 자금에 대한 액세스 권한을 제공합니다 OPD의 전문가 서비스 정책과 숙련된 OPD 직원의 기술 지원 접근. OPD는 OPD와 독립적으로 계약하는 사회복지사들에게 변호사 사건을 지원하고 부모를 지원하는 서비스를 제공합니다. 또한 OPD는 계약자를 위한 가상 아카데미, 짧은 은행, 사전 교육 자료 및 양식에 대한 접근 권한을 제공합니다. OPD 계약자는 의존 목록에 등록하여 주 전역의 의존 변호사들의 풍부한 지식과 경험을 얻을 수 있습니다. 또한 OPD는 계약자가 계약 교육 요건을 충족할 수 있도록 매년 여러 CLE를 조정하고 호스팅합니다.

 

PRP 목적 진술: 부모-자녀 관계에서 국가의 개입에 직면한 불우한 부모들을 위한 다학제적 상담 권리 서비스의 효과적이고 효율적인 제공을 주도, 관리 및 지원함으로써 공정하고 공평한 아동 복지 시스템을 보장합니다.

자격 요건들

다음 자격 요건이 필요합니다: 

  • 워싱턴 주 변호사 자격증 소지자.
  • 워싱턴 주 대법원의 불성실한 방어 기준을 충족하는 능력.
  • 부모의 권리, 부당한 방어, 그리고 사회 정의 문제에 대한 헌신이 입증되었습니다.
  • 인종, 성별, 출신 국가, 장애, 계급이 교차하여 개인과 가족이 삶에서 국가의 개입을 경험하고 국가가 존재할 때 도전하려는 의지를 갖게 되는 방식에 대한 경험이나 관심.
  • 사건 전반에 걸쳐 트라우마에 기반한, 반인종주의적, 교차적, 비판단적, 진정한 전인적 옹호에 대한 에너지, 열정 및 헌신을 표현할 수 있는 경험 및/또는 능력.
  • RCW 13.34 및 종속성 및 종료 사건과 관련된 법원 규칙에 대한 숙지.
  • 큰 스트레스를 자주 받는 고객들에게 반응하고 명확하게 소통하세요.
  • 다른 당사자 및 모든 종속 법원 파트너와 협력하고 업무 관계를 발전시키세요.
  • 관심 있는 관할 구역에서의 경험이 선호되지만 필수는 아닙니다.

신청 절차

지원서는 직책이 채워질 때까지 접수됩니다. 지원하려면 자격증과 이력서를 확인하는 관심 서한을 이메일로 보내주세요. 관심 서한에는 지원자의 현재 공개 계약에 대한 설명도 포함되어야 합니다 방어 또는 현재 의존성 및 종료 사례가 있는 경우 기존 사례 부하뿐만 아니라 다른 표현도 포함됩니다.  

보충 정보

이메일 자료: [email protected]      

위 이메일 주소로 궁금한 점이 있으시면 언제든지 문의해 주세요.

OPD는 이 자격 요청서를 수정할 권리를 보유하며, 모든 신청자와의 계약을 자제할 권리를 보유합니다. 이 자격 요청서는 워싱턴 주 또는 OPD가 여기에 명시된 서비스에 대해 계약할 의무를 지지 않습니다.

워싱턴 주 국방부는 노동력의 다양성을 적극적으로 추구합니다. 여성, 인종 및 소수 민족, 성소수자, 장애인, 과거 수감된 개인, 군 참전용사 등이 지원할 것을 권장합니다.


[이 웹사이트에서 제공되는 혜택 정보] 
계약자에게 적용되지 않음]

SeattleKR Job Analysis

RFQ Attorney Representation For Indigent Parents In Dependency and Termination Cases

Key Skills and Qualifications

Technical Skills

RCW 13.34 and court rules pertaining to dependency and termination cases
Washington State Supreme Court Standards for Indigent Defense

Soft Skills

Trauma-informed advocacy
Anti-racist, intersectional, non-judgmental, and truly holistic advocacy
Communication skills with stressed clients
Collaboration and relationship-building with court partners
Energy, enthusiasm, and commitment to indigent defense

Qualifications

Licensed member of good standing with the Washington State Bar
Master's degree or higher (not specified)
Experience in dependency and termination cases
Commitment to parents' rights and social justice issues
Interest in intersectional advocacy

Physical Requirements

No specific physical requirements mentioned in the job description.

Sample Interview Questions and Answers

Question 1: How would you approach representing an indigent parent who is facing termination of their parental rights, particularly in a case where there are allegations of neglect or abuse?

When representing an indigent parent in a termination case, I would first take the time to thoroughly understand the client's situation and circumstances. This includes reviewing the court documents, speaking with the client about their experiences and concerns, and researching relevant case law and legislation. Next, I would identify areas where the state's allegations may be unsupported or disputed, such as through investigation of the child's living environment or examination of potential biases in the reporting process. I would then work closely with my client to develop a defense strategy that is tailored to their unique needs and circumstances. This might involve seeking expert testimony, advocating for alternative solutions to termination, or challenging the state's evidence through cross-examination and other means. Throughout the case, I would prioritize maintaining open and honest communication with my client, keeping them informed about developments and providing support as needed. Ultimately, my goal is to ensure that my client's rights are protected and their voice is heard in court.

Question 2: What strategies would you use to address implicit bias in your representation of indigent parents, particularly those from historically marginalized communities?

As an attorney representing indigent parents, I recognize the importance of addressing implicit bias in my practice. To do this, I would first take the time to educate myself on the systemic and structural barriers that disproportionately affect historically marginalized communities. This might involve attending training sessions or workshops on issues like cultural competence, racial bias, and trauma-informed care. Next, I would work to create a safe and inclusive environment for my clients, acknowledging their experiences and validating their emotions. I would also strive to remain aware of potential biases in the reporting process, court proceedings, and even within my own thought processes. To mitigate these biases, I might seek input from colleagues or experts with diverse backgrounds and perspectives, or engage in reflective practice to identify areas for improvement. Throughout the case, I would prioritize transparency and communication with my client, ensuring that they are aware of any potential biases or concerns and feel empowered to make informed decisions about their representation.

Question 3: How would you handle a situation where there is a conflict between your client's wishes and the needs of the child in dependency proceedings?

In cases where there is a conflict between my client's wishes and the needs of the child, I would first take the time to thoroughly understand both perspectives. This might involve seeking input from social workers, therapists, or other experts who have worked with the family. Next, I would work closely with my client to explore potential alternatives that balance their rights and interests with those of the child. If necessary, this might involve negotiating with opposing counsel or the court to develop a compromise that meets both parties' needs. Throughout the case, I would prioritize maintaining open and honest communication with all parties involved, ensuring that everyone is aware of the client's wishes and concerns. Ultimately, my goal is to ensure that the child's best interests are protected while also advocating for my client's rights.

Original Job Description

Description

STATE OF WASHINGTON

OFFICE OF PUBLIC DEFENSE

711 South Capitol Way, Suite 106, 

Olympia, Washington 98504-0957

REQUEST FOR QUALIFICATIONS

RFQ25031

ATTORNEY REPRESENTATION FOR INDIGENT PARENTS 

IN DEPENDENCY AND TERMINATION CASES


[BENEFITS INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE 
DOES NOT APPLY TO CONTRACTORS]

The Washington State Office of Public Defense (OPD) Parents Representation Program (PRP) currently provides state funded attorney representation and case support services to indigent parents, custodians and legal guardians involved in child dependency and termination of parental rights proceedings in all Washington counties.  

Snohomish County: A part-time caseload of at least 25% (20 open and active dependency and termination cases) up to 100% (80 open and active dependency and termination cases). The position is open until filled and the start date is negotiable.

All Counties: Although OPD does not anticipate any immediate openings, OPD is willing to accept applications for all counties in order to identify interested parties if openings become available in the future. 

The approximate caseload for a full-time attorney is 80 cases. The current annual compensation for a full-time contractor is $200,347. Part-time attorney position compensation is pro-rated based on a percentage of a full-time case load. Compensation includes all overhead such as support staff, rent, and other costs of doing business.   Compensation is dependent on experience.   PFML often is available to employees of our contractors (including private law firms). PFML program includes an opt-in for self-employed people such as our solo practice contractors. More information can be found at the following link https://paidleave.wa.gov/elective-coverage/

If interested, follow the application procedures below. 

Support: OPD provides contracted attorneys access to funds for expert services pursuant to OPD’s expert services policy, as well as access to technical support from experienced OPD staff. OPD provides social services workers who contract independently with OPD to assist attorneys on cases and provide support for parents.  In addition, OPD provides access to a virtual academy for contractors, a contractor online toolbox that includes a brief bank, prior training materials, and access to forms.  OPD contractors can sign up for the dependency list serve to gain access to a wealth of knowledge and experience of dependency attorneys statewide.   OPD also coordinates and hosts a number of CLEs annually to ensure contractors can meet contractual training requirements.

 

PRP Purpose Statement: Ensuring a fair and equitable child welfare system by leading, administering, and supporting the effective and efficient delivery of multidisciplinary right-to-counsel services for indigent parents facing state intervention in the parent-child relationship.

Qualifications

The following qualifications are required: 

  • Licensed member of good standing with the Washington State Bar.
  • Ability to meet Washington State Supreme Court Standards for Indigent Defense.
  • A demonstrated commitment to parents’ rights, indigent defense, and social justice issues.
  • Experience or interest in how race, gender, national origin, disability, and class intersect to create disparities for individuals and families experiencing state intervention in their lives and a willingness to challenge the state when it exists.
  • Experience and/or ability to provide representation with energy, enthusiasm and a commitment to trauma-informed, anti-racist, intersectional, non-judgmental, and truly holistic advocacy throughout the case.
  • Familiarity with RCW 13.34 and court rules pertaining to dependency and termination cases.
  • Be responsive to, and communicate clearly with, clients who are often under great stress.
  • Collaborate and develop working relationships with other parties and all dependency court partners.
  • Experience in the jurisdiction for which you are interested is preferred, but not required.

Application Procedure

Applications will be accepted until the positions are filled. To apply, email a letter of interest identifying your qualifications and a resume.  Letters of interest should also describe applicant’s current contracts for public defense or other representation, as well as existing caseload, specifying the number of your current dependency and termination cases, if any.  

Supplemental Information

Email Materials to: [email protected]      

Please also address any questions to the above email address.

OPD reserves the right to amend this Request for Qualifications and reserves the right to refrain from contracting with any and all applicants.   This Request for Qualifications does not obligate the state of Washington or OPD to contract for the services specified here.

The Washington State Office of Public Defense vigorously pursues diversity in the work force. Women, racial and ethnic minorities, LGBTQ, persons with disabilities, formerly incarcerated individuals, and military veterans are encouraged to apply.


[BENEFITS INFORMATION PROVIDED ON THIS WEBSITE 
DOES NOT APPLY TO CONTRACTORS]

접수기간/방법

7일 09:30:37
시작일 3/31/2025 (월)
마감일 4/30/2025 (수)
11:59 PM 마감
홈페이지 지원
홈페이지 지원 클릭수: 16